Friday, January 20, 2012
Arguments.
While I'm looking back at my week I think this is the crux of my week. I have read many arguments on Facebook, been in arguments over board games, and even talked about conflict-resolution in premarital consoling. I have been around passive people whom are always trying to stop an argument. Passive-aggressive people who want to speak there voice but thats just "their opinion." Then there is a aggressive people who are always looking for an argument no matter what. This is the dynamic that we live in.
Should I argue or should I let things slide off my back? I have been seeing many Christians argue about theological differences. I heard a funny quote: "You are going to be bashed if you pastor a church called Mars Hill." Is it helpful for Christians to argue on the Internet? Does this hinder non-Christians view of the movement of God?
For me this argument has helped me converse with people at my work about Christians and the differing view points. If I didn't have people like Peter Enns and his honest discussion about the humanity of the Biblical text I would have never been able to relate to some of my friends who are distracted by the "errors" of the Bible. But on the other side of the spectrum I see families clinging to any pastor who explains the cohesiveness of the family.
We can see that on both of these ideas there are strong and passionate arguments against them. What is negative about this is when we see people bashing each other left and right. It is important to remember that no matter the argument you are still dealing with a person. Even if you say two nice things about them and then dig deep into that person no matter how dirty or mean they seem, it still is harmful. Some people do make statements that call you to argue and attack the statement, not the person.
I would love to see a more cohesive community of Christians. Where people are lifting each other up despite there different ideas. Rabbis in Jesus' time would have different ideas, they thought that the Bible was open ended and there was different ways of interpreting it. This would obviously bring up arguments. We can see this over and over again in Jesus' ministry, but he had John the Baptist to back up his new way of thinking. John was a respected rabbi in the Jewish community, so in turn this would make Jesus a respected rabbi. We can see that this would give him authority that all he would have to do is speak and people would follow. Jesus became a controversial man, that he needed to go through the "way of doing things" to get his point across. He is God and could have done it anyway but he chose to communicate this way.
Why am I explaining this?
We need to note Jesus' way of doing things and look at how he got his authority. Arguments are inevitable, especially if we are asking the right questions and trying to grow in our faith. Do you have the authority to bash other pastors or people to get your point across? Do you really know if the differing view is really a cult? Let's be honest and frank, but stop the name calling.
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Bible Vs Prayer!
You need prayer to keep this conversation going. You need to know what Jesus is doing in your life and what he has done in the past. the Bible is the most important way to do it.
If you have more questions about the Bible please post!
How do you pray?
What are your stories of prayer answered?
How has the Bible help you get closer to God?
Tuesday, November 9, 2010
Leprosy.
40A man with leprosy [8] came to him and begged him on his knees, az “If you are willing, you can make me clean.”
41Jesus was indignant. [9] He reached out his hand and touched the man. “I am willing,” he said. “Be clean!” 42Immediately the leprosy left him and he was cleansed.
43Jesus sent him away at once with a strong warning: 44“See that you don’t tell this to anyone. ba But go, show yourself to the priest bb and offer the sacrifices that Moses commanded for your cleansing, bcas a testimony to them.” 45Instead he went out and began to talk freely, spreading the news. As a result, Jesus could no longer enter a town openly but stayed outside in lonely places. bd Yet the people still came to him from everywhere
This really spoke to me about Gods grace. Jesus healed the man even though he would not obey. This seems so much like me. God always forgives me and call me to be one of his followers even though I will end up deliberately disobeying him. I find it much better to follow but Gods grace is amazing.
Sunday, January 17, 2010
My last semester in school.
Friday, June 19, 2009
The woods.
Wednesday, May 20, 2009
White Trash
Monday, May 18, 2009
Learning
Monday, May 11, 2009
How we talk about God.

I have been reading Exodus because I want to understand how the Old Testament shapes the New Testament.
Saturday, March 7, 2009
Tithing
Now that I've given you the 'party line,' I should tell you that I respectfully disagree with this position. I don't see tithing actually being renewed as a principle under the new covenant. Jesus' affirmation of tithing should be seen on the same level as his affirmation of offering sacrifices (Mt. 5:23-24). That is, if Jesus affirms sacrifices, but we don't see any reason for them to continue to today, I need much more than a passing affirmation of people tithing at the time to see it as being renewed under the new covenant. Further, where one would expect Paul to refer to tithing as a means of gathering a collection to provide for others (1 Cor 16; 2 Cor. 8-9) he doesn't. He talks about regular, sacrificial, and generous giving, but doesn't mention anything about setting aside a tithe. In light of this, therefore, I see that the NT principle seems to be bound up in being a regular, sacrificial, and generous giver. Ten percent seems like a good place to start, and I practice that, but I don't see it as a requirement. For some, giving sacrificially may mean less than 10% (for some 3 or 5% would be a sacrifice because of their income). For others giving sacrificially would mean giving more than 10%.
Overall, the key thing is to give because it all belongs to God anyway. There's no magic formula associated with tithing (those that argue that you won't be blessed if you don't give the 10% have a very low view of God in my perspective - God 'sends his rain on the righteous and the wicked'). If you give 10% of your income great. If you do more than that great! If you can only sacrificially give less than that is great as well."
Thursday, January 15, 2009
The church and consumerism.
I have been thinking a lot about Israels call to be different, to be not the norm. While I was in Ezra and Nehemiah during a Jan Term(a 8hr a day, for five days intensive) at my school I heavily noticed this. Ezra and Nehemiah is all about the build of the temple which established Israel as a nation and Gods chosen people. In these book they struggle with a sin that threatens them into being sent into exile again. This sin is some of the men have taken on foreign wives.(Ezra 9:1-5) Ezra ask for forgiveness in an extensive prayer taken on his burden of his people on for himself.(Ezra 9:6-15) “His(Ezra) apparent despair provokes them to seek hope for Israel at any cost, and his abandonment to grief stirs them to impatience for some more positive response.”(Kidner 70) This brings the Israelites to make a drastic and I would say necessary decision to be different then the world around them. Israel decides to send away all the foreign wives and their children.(Ezra 10:3) This was by no means was the Law called for, but it was a necessary evil. They need to separate themselves from their sin and move into what God called them to.
So since we have been grafted into this(If you are a gentile)(Romans 11:17-24) I think we too have a call to take drastic measures to be different and set apart from our community. The reason foreign wives were such a problem in these passages in Ezra was because they were bringing in their pagan gods and heathen tradition.(Goldengay) Israel was becoming these other nations and not being set apart like they should be.
I believe Jesus as well gives a call that I think the church is missing out on. In the simple book of Mark he tells a story of a rich young ruler who ask a question. The question he is asking is “what must I do to inherit eternal life?”(Mark 10:17) Jesus responds in I would say a sarcastic way. He states that the young ruler knows the ten commandments and keeps them.(Mark 10:19) The ruler say “of course I do.”(Mark 10:20) Here comes Jesus with a stinger. A call to be different then everyone else. A call to change his whole life completely around. Jesus says "One thing you lack: go and sell all you possess and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; and come, follow Me." (Mark 10:21) This man went away sad. He had tons of property and possessions.(Mark 10:22) I think it is crazy here because it does not say this man had lots money but he had lots of possession.
Why as the American church are we striving to win people for Christ with the coolest possessions?(well thats how I view it in my eyes?) I have heard of many churches recently having to lay off pastors because they could not make budget in this recent economy. What if instead of this the churches sold their million dollar buildings or sold their 30,000 dollar sound boards? Do we really need these things to reach Christ? Are we really being different then the culture around us?
I would say no. I recently stepped foot on a church campus and I thought I was at Mall of America. Is this what God really wants? Are as a church supposed to be consumerist just like the rest of the world? Are we supposed to go into dept on new building that are supposed to reach a community? Is the call to give all your money to the poor a lost thing?
I would like to know everyone else thoughts.